Skip to main content

Quasi-Experiment

Definition

A quasi-experiment is a type of research study that looks like a true experiment, but doesn't have all the key ingredients. In a true experiment, researchers randomly assign participants to different groups (like a treatment group and a control group) to test if something causes a change. Random assignment is really important because it ensures groups are as similar as possible at the start, so any differences you see later are likely due to what you did (the treatment) and not pre-existing differences between the groups.

Quasi-experiments don't use random assignment. Instead, researchers often look at groups that already exist, or groups where assignment wasn't random. This makes it harder to be certain that the results are due to the treatment, because there might be other factors that explain the differences between the groups. However, quasi-experiments are often the only way to study certain questions, especially in real-world settings where it’s not ethical or practical to randomly assign people to groups.

Example

A school counselor wants to see if a new anti-bullying program is effective. They can’t randomly assign students to be bullied or not bullied! Instead, the counselor implements the anti-bullying program in one 6th-grade class (the treatment group), but not in another 6th-grade class in the same school (the control group). They then compare the number of reported bullying incidents in both classes before and after the program is implemented.

This is a quasi-experiment because the students weren't randomly assigned to the classes. The classes already existed, and the counselor used those existing groups. It's possible the class that received the program was already more aware of bullying or had more engaged students. These pre-existing differences could affect the results, even if the program itself has no effect.

Why it Matters

Quasi-experiments are important because they allow us to study real-world phenomena that we can't ethically or practically manipulate with a true experiment. Think about things like the effects of a new law, the impact of a natural disaster, or the consequences of a different parenting style. We can't make these things happen to people. While quasi-experiments aren't as strong as true experiments in terms of proving cause-and-effect, they can provide valuable evidence and help us understand complex issues. Researchers using quasi-experimental designs are careful to acknowledge the limitations and consider other possible explanations for their findings, leading to more nuanced and realistic conclusions.


Related: